Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Search found 4347 matches
Search these results:

Author Message

 Forum: Tournaments, Conventions and Meet-ups   Topic: EpicUK xmas megabattle

 Post subject: Re: EpicUK xmas megabattle
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2014 3:31 pm 

Replies: 13
Views: 2338


Nothing says Christmas like a massive war :)

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes   Topic: 2015 Codex Marines TRIAL list-[CLOSED]

Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2014 2:33 am 

Replies: 46
Views: 11188


Tried a few times assault marines with the preds with flamers in the sallie list for 250 (same as here) and they were an ok formation. Slightly more likely to field it than before as otherwise the assault marine remains fairly redundant. The addition of the 3+ FF to the formation gives it some abil...

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes   Topic: 2015 Codex Marines TRIAL list-[CLOSED]

Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2014 1:38 am 

Replies: 46
Views: 11188


Looking good Dobbsy, these are mostly really solid suggestions and should work well. Thanks Ginger, I hope so. :) Some comments :- ⋅ List name Why not give this list a higher version number; V5.0 (Experimental) while also adding a version number to the existing "approved" list Y...

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes   Topic: 2015 Codex Marines TRIAL list-[CLOSED]

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2014 10:55 pm 

Replies: 46
Views: 11188


[edit] Due to little interest in this and AC shift will be closing this down. We'll discuss in 2016 fresh [edit] Now that the new amendments to the Codex list have been put through, I would like to assess some other changes to the list for possible future inclusions. It's main aim is to: Break the r...

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes   Topic: [Old] Raven Guard 2014-12-08

 Post subject: Re: Raven Guard 2014-12-08
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2014 8:39 pm 

Replies: 60
Views: 11818


Dave, I've updated the link in Index Astartes to show this thread and locked the old one. Let me know if you'd prefer that one left unlocked though.

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes   Topic: Raven Guard 1.X

 Post subject: Re: Raven Guard 1.X
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2014 8:31 pm 

Replies: 126
Views: 17836


Locking this thread as it has been superceded here

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes   Topic: Raven Guard 1.X

 Post subject: Re: Raven Guard 1.X
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2014 1:57 am 

Replies: 126
Views: 17836


Possibly the Canberrans but not sure now.

 Forum: Epic Armageddon   Topic: Counter charge

 Post subject: Re: Counter charge
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2014 1:56 am 

Replies: 37
Views: 5770


Ulrik wrote:
The rules are actually pretty straightforward:

2013 Tournament Pack wrote:
A unit must use their counter charge move to move directly
towards
the closest enemy unit.


The rule I hate the most in all of E:A! :D

 Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments   Topic: Questions: The Demolisher Cannon

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2014 5:37 pm 

Replies: 55
Views: 11142


IC, IC FF and Disrupt will give Demolisher armed units that 'scary' feel in assault This is where I'm at given the resistance to trying the speed change. After that, I agree with TRC that we need to work on the formation costs and upgrades. For Marines I would try either [list][*]225 for four with ...

 Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments   Topic: Questions: The Demolisher Cannon

Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 11:28 pm 

Replies: 55
Views: 11142


Yeah a possibility only right now as nothing is confirmed in any way. Strange though, I would have imagined the speed change to be the first to attempt given that it effects less lists and is not the weapon stat. Ginger, in regards to the 10cm countercharge, this might be a nice abstract way to help...

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes   Topic: The NetEA Codex list. How do you feel about it? A few Qs

Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 8:10 pm 

Replies: 266
Views: 33109


Amendments to the Codex list have now been made here.

Further developmental ideas will also be put forward in a trial list TBA.

Cheers for all the discussion in this thread folks.

Feel free to continue here if you have anything further to contribute.

 Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments   Topic: Questions: The Demolisher Cannon

Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 7:54 pm 

Replies: 55
Views: 11142


At this point gents, I am generally in favour of adding Disrupt + IC FF to the Vindicator in a trial Codex list, TBA. I'll also be trialling it as the Astartes Demolisher to give some differentiation. Some will no doubt like it, others hate it but I would like to see what this will bring to a possib...

 Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes   Topic: Amendments to the Codex list

Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2014 6:59 pm 

Replies: 20
Views: 4981


I've presented the following amendments to the NetERC and they have approved them so will take immediate effect within the list. I know some may feel these didn't perhaps go far enough and others will feel perhaps weren't necessary at all but I feel I took the median path, deciding on small steps (I...

 Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments   Topic: Questions: The Demolisher Cannon

Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2014 9:09 pm 

Replies: 55
Views: 11142


From the 40K wiki: The Demolisher Cannon used by Vindicators fires a special siege shell, consisting of an armour-piercing tip, heavier shell casing and a massive explosive charge micro-fused to allow penetration of a building or bunker before detonating. Could be a reasonable way to explain an adju...

 Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments   Topic: Questions: The Demolisher Cannon

Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2014 2:23 am 

Replies: 55
Views: 11142


agree with the idea to trial them with the IC Disrupt rule first and see if that gives them a place in the list Yeah thinking this is the only road open to start with but still grates on me that it'll give Chaos and IG lists a boost as well :D Still, the Marine list Vindicator is my focus so I have...
Sort by:  
Page 7 of 290 [ Search found 4347 matches ]



Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net