| Author |
Message |
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: Couple of questions for game yesterday |
| Hena2 |
|
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2022 3:09 pm
|
|
Replies: 7
Views: 1283
|
| 2. I'm going to disagree here. Macro Weapon only ignores the saves for cover, not the -1 to hit. That's why the Black Legion Decimator has 3 Barrage Points, Ignore Cover, Macro Weapon. You are right, I read the question wrong... I blame morning :). 3a. Landing outside the screening ZoC and having t... |
|
 |
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: Couple of questions for game yesterday |
| Hena2 |
|
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2022 9:54 am
|
|
Replies: 7
Views: 1283
|
| 1. Depends where the Ignore Cover is. If it is in ranged weapon (ie. weapon has a range with no brackets) then no. If it is in small arms or assault weapon, then if that weapon is on use, then yes to those attacks. 2. Yes. Oh, mistake. I read the question wrong. It ignores the save, but not the -1 m... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Chaos Topic: LatD Redux change tracking |
| Hena2 |
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2022 2:20 pm
|
|
Replies: 29
Views: 6763
|
| As person who plays LatD, I'm somewhat interested in any changes for the main LatD list that this would incur. I like the LatD list itself mind you. I assume that the intention is not to replace the main list. Also if someone could change the plague zombies from 3+2d6 something sensible (such as 7+d... |
|
|
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: The Joys of shooting |
| Hena2 |
|
Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2021 6:32 pm
|
|
Replies: 13
Views: 3270
|
| It doesn’t stretch per weapon type, other than Macro Weapon hits. EDIT We've always played with stretching happening per weapon type as well. Similarly the cover modifiers are applied per target type. And cover modifiers aren't either. You choose for the entire formation whether you're shooting int... |
|
|
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: The Joys of shooting |
| Hena2 |
|
Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2021 9:50 am
|
|
Replies: 13
Views: 3270
|
| We've always played with stretching happening per weapon type as well. Similarly the cover modifiers are applied per target type. Also the 2008 FAQ did have that speed rolling example which pools rolls (and btw doesn't seem to exist NetEA FAQs. 1.9.5 Roll To Hit Q: Is there any way to speed up the d... |
|
|
Forum: Tactical Command Updates Topic: Unstable Site/Server (May 2021) |
| Hena2 |
|
Posted: Wed May 19, 2021 3:41 pm
|
|
Replies: 6
Views: 3626
|
| Don't worry CS, you are doing great work for Epic community. |
|
|
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: Line of Sight in Epic Armageddon |
| Hena2 |
|
Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2021 12:35 pm
|
|
Replies: 18
Views: 5159
|
| Usually for us, we decide before game what can be covered by what. For example ruins, check from highest point. Multi-tiered hills, per tier. Usually along the lines of these can cover WEs, these can cover Warhound sized, these full sized titans etc. |
|
|
Forum: EA Strategy, Tactics and Army Lists Topic: Request: Youtube series going over NetEA Ruleset |
| Hena2 |
|
Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2021 12:32 pm
|
|
Replies: 5
Views: 11978
|
| There was a set of videos going over the basic rules a longish time ago, from nee nach. But if you have a good idea on how it should go, I might be able to do it. |
|
|
Forum: General Discussion Topic: They're baaaaack |
| Hena2 |
|
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2021 11:11 pm
|
|
Replies: 10
Views: 6188
|
|
|
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: Codex Astartes Space Marines "They shall know no fear" rule |
| Hena2 |
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2021 9:52 pm
|
|
Replies: 6
Views: 1816
|
| Yes, it feels a bit weird. However the aim of the rallying rule is to put the formation to "half way to breaking" situation. Since Marines require twice as much blast markers to break the end result is half way to breaking even if they end up having more BMs numerically (due to ATSKNF). |
|
|
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: If you could change the rules... |
| Hena2 |
|
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 8:21 pm
|
|
Replies: 94
Views: 82203
|
| My biggest pet peeve with rules is the individual unit formations (esp with fearless), such as commissars in IG. I would make a minimum % of formation to need to be alive to be around. Amusingly I did go further and wrote up a new ruleset because I felt like trying how hard it would be. Of course I... |
|
|
Forum: General Science Fiction Wargames (10mm, 6mm and smaller) Topic: Rare Earth: Conflict |
| Hena2 |
|
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 8:19 pm
|
|
Replies: 0
Views: 2716
|
| Hi, I was asked earlier to upload a ruleset that I ended up writing. I also uploaded a section of background I wrote as well. I did a short story that I'll copy paste&paste here as "teaser" of sorts. Since I wrote these stuff in mainly one go, writing is pretty bad. Someone re-wrote th... |
|
|
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: If you could change the rules... |
| Hena2 |
|
Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2020 6:01 am
|
|
Replies: 94
Views: 82203
|
| My biggest pet peeve with rules is the individual unit formations (esp with fearless), such as commissars in IG. I would make a minimum % of formation to need to be alive to be around. What's wrong with commissars? I dislike that a singe stand is allowed to exists in the scale of epic (ie. platoon ... |
|
|
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: If you could change the rules... |
| Hena2 |
|
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2020 4:09 pm
|
|
Replies: 94
Views: 82203
|
| My biggest pet peeve with rules is the individual unit formations (esp with fearless), such as commissars in IG. I would make a minimum % of formation to need to be alive to be around. What's wrong with commissars? I dislike that a singe stand is allowed to exists in the scale of epic (ie. platoon ... |
|
|
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: If you could change the rules... |
| Hena2 |
|
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2020 4:56 pm
|
|
Replies: 94
Views: 82203
|
| My biggest pet peeve with rules is the individual unit formations (esp with fearless), such as commissars in IG. I would make a minimum % of formation to need to be alive to be around. Amusingly I did go further and wrote up a new ruleset because I felt like trying how hard it would be. Of course I ... |
|
|
| Sort by: |