Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Search found 366 matches
Search these results:

Author Message

 Forum: Wargames Trades   Topic: W: 2nd edition gargant/great gargant

Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2021 4:39 pm 

Replies: 1
Views: 118


I have one but i cherish it a lot so i cannot help in that regard but i could maybe do it in another away. Do you not prefer the first edition one for the GG? It is almost the same as the second edition hull-wise but witha lot more weapons. Also have you tried with Primarch? I have a very late catal...

 Forum: NetEA Imperial Guard   Topic: Minervan changes

 Post subject: Re: Minervan changes
Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2021 11:03 am 

Replies: 37
Views: 989


Everyone else on the thread seems for it, While it is not completely true, as now Scarik is against both changes and some others are not interested in deleting LR companies like they pretty much are with your proposal, that about what you wrote in that part is the main reason I have posted in this ...

 Forum: NetEA Imperial Guard   Topic: [Development] Mobile Forces of Catachan 0.4

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2021 8:56 am 

Replies: 37
Views: 16766


While your answer is clear already, Largo_W, i think he is talking about the No Garrison rule you copied from Eldar's, which nullifies the normal rules for formations eligible for garrisons. He is asking if formations with extra units not listed on the No Garrison rule can still be garrisoned. For e...

 Forum: NetEA Imperial Guard   Topic: Minervan changes

 Post subject: Re: Minervan changes
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 2:14 pm 

Replies: 37
Views: 989


Two new formations isn't going to push this list into the kitchen sink category. Yeah, bad wording from my part. What i wanted to say is that back then the intention was probably to make lists thematic and focus Minerva on the RA units, which it actually is, and they left the lighter tanks focus to...

 Forum: NetEA Imperial Guard   Topic: Minervan changes

 Post subject: Re: Minervan changes
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 10:37 am 

Replies: 37
Views: 989


Just thinking, does someone here remember why Minnerva hadn't been added no Griffon or Hellhound formations back in the day? To avoid kitchen sink lists maybe? I think we should work taking into account that first. A Destroyer Tank Hunter’s 40k stats don’t at all justify titan killer – it’s nowhere ...

 Forum: NetEA Imperial Guard   Topic: Minervan changes

 Post subject: Re: Minervan changes
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2021 3:28 pm 

Replies: 37
Views: 989


I am of the opinion that it is better to make what we have work instead of working with something different. So make Leman Russ companies more viable rather than to completely modify one of the basic parts of GI in EA. Also, if it isn't broken don't change it, or don't kill flies with cannons. I thi...

 Forum: 6mm (and 8mm)   Topic: Epic miniatures painting video on YouTube

Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2021 9:27 am 

Replies: 2
Views: 199


Yes it is interesting and entertaining, even though it feels a bit unfocused sometimes.

I specially like how he explains it: [...]Detail don't really matter [...]not at this scale[...]

 Forum: Epic 40K   Topic: sample starter marine list?

Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 3:30 pm 

Replies: 6
Views: 405


I do not know enough about example lists to offer advice but i am interested in this. Detachment size is a whole discussion topic in itself, arguably more so than in EA! Is there any articles you can point to about this? I do not remember reading much of that in the WD and other magazine's articles,...

 Forum: Epic 40K   Topic: n00by basing questions

 Post subject: Re: n00by basing questions
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2021 8:33 am 

Replies: 17
Views: 1314


@Abetillo I am in southern New Hampshire. Right now I am primarily concerned with figuring out painting 6mms (sooo tiny). You can check https://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=28070&p=533872&hilit=New+Hampshire#p533872 for an idea about the Northeastern US area, but...

 Forum: NetEA Eldar   Topic: Dark Eldar upgrade reductions

Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2021 8:22 am 

Replies: 3
Views: 531


Good, thanks.

That was a quick voting of the changes.

 Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments   Topic: NetEA Unit Cards

 Post subject: Re: NetEA Unit Cards
Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2021 4:25 pm 

Replies: 7
Views: 1175


Good work. That looks useful for new players. By the way, have you though of adding a photo of the unit to the back of each card. They have lots of blank space which could be used for new players to identify the units and there is some webs from where you could get them relatively easily. Also, for ...

 Forum: Epic 40K   Topic: n00by basing questions

 Post subject: Re: n00by basing questions
Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2021 3:51 pm 

Replies: 17
Views: 1314


Welcome to Epic, Pocho Azul. Hopefully my brother and I will find opponents other than each other (gets boring playing only one opponent, all the time). Where are you from? The community is a bit hidden so it is easy to miss people nearby.Maybe we could help. That is useful info. Basing for Armagedd...

 Forum: 6mm (and 8mm)   Topic: Transparent Bases

 Post subject: Re: Transparent Bases
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2021 8:04 am 

Replies: 6
Views: 285


I have gone into transparent bases myself by accident, when trying to find the cheapest material to make some, and i am gravitating more and more towards them. They look cool, they integrate a lot better with anything else, i save time on painting, and even GI/SM tanks on bases do not look that much...

 Forum: 6mm (and 8mm)   Topic: Basing vehicles?

 Post subject: Re: Basing vehicles?
Posted: Sun May 09, 2021 9:32 am 

Replies: 21
Views: 910


Yeah, exactly as IJW Wartrader says. A bit tangent of that, but i have been wondering for a long time why basing vehicles is something recent and why it has been increasing with the time. Could it be related that we got influenced by the official magazines where it was not based and now as the years...

 Forum: Wargaming Web News   Topic: Aeronautica Re-release

 Post subject: Re: Aeronautica Re-release
Posted: Fri May 07, 2021 7:11 pm 

Replies: 94
Views: 20911


Turbo-Laser and two missiles. It is a 45cm AT Bomber. About the other, as you have guessed from me wanting to use those two or the Wyvern for Thunderhawks, i prefer size to a scale number, so FW ones are too big. thanks for telling, anyways. If going to buy Epic ones, i would be more interested on m...
Sort by:  
Page 1 of 25 [ Search found 366 matches ]



Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net