| Author |
Message |
Forum: Wargaming Web News Topic: Fanatic Online #100 |
| Bombot |
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 4:05 pm
|
|
Replies: 108
Views: 22328
|
(Reaver @ May 22 2008,15:42)
QUOTE [quote="Bombot,May 22 2008,15:37"]If that were the plan then, well 'the plan', makes no sense at all. ?Why go to all the trouble of rearranging the setup just to have to delete it later?
Yes well that clearly wasn't 'the plan'. |
|
 |
Forum: Wargaming Web News Topic: Fanatic Online #100 |
| Bombot |
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 3:39 pm
|
|
Replies: 108
Views: 22328
|
| (Warmaster Nice @ May 22 2008,15:36)QUOTEIIRC GW reserves the right to change prices/incorrect pricing in the store. Werther that'd stand up according to Danish laws of marketing is a different matter. I once got a mobile phone much cheaper because the store had accidentally set a wrong price at th... |
|
|
Forum: Wargaming Web News Topic: Fanatic Online #100 |
| Bombot |
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 3:37 pm
|
|
Replies: 108
Views: 22328
|
| (Dwarf Supreme @ May 22 2008,15:16)QUOTEI'm trying to be optimistic about this change. Having SG on the main GW site is theoretically a good thing, but the pessimist in me is saying that this is just a temporary move until SG gets canned completely. If that were the plan then, well 'the plan', make... |
|
|
Forum: Wargaming Web News Topic: Fanatic Online #100 |
| Bombot |
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 1:59 pm
|
|
Replies: 108
Views: 22328
|
| Anyway - and this is probably as much a reason for my instinctive optimistic reaction regarding this announcement - whatever happens to rules support it's pretty clear that the Specialist Games ranges are not in imminent danger of demise. That was what some were fearing a year ago. |
|
|
Forum: Wargaming Web News Topic: Fanatic Online #100 |
| Bombot |
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 1:04 pm
|
|
Replies: 108
Views: 22328
|
Articles and whatnot can be maintained by third party websites. It's really no big deal.
Ok, you can name downsides, but the upsides are far greater...that is the point. |
|
|
Forum: Wargaming Web News Topic: Fanatic Online #100 |
| Bombot |
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 12:00 pm
|
|
Replies: 108
Views: 22328
|
| CS Edit: Lets not throw stones here guys. Different people have different methods. Thanks. Got to agree I'm afraid. I asked specifically if help was wanted with proof-reading and was told it was all in hand...and out went the 'final' version complete with typos. Suppose it makes it look more l... |
|
|
Forum: Wargaming Web News Topic: Fanatic Online #100 |
| Bombot |
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 11:48 am
|
|
Replies: 108
Views: 22328
|
| I believe that pricing issue is some dollar / pound mix up (happened to Leman Russ tanks or something the other day). Don't worry about it. Look guys, if Specialist Games are going to gain more prominence then the pay-off is you lose the ability to tweak at will. That's just the way it i... |
|
|
Forum: Wargaming Web News Topic: Fanatic Online #100 |
| Bombot |
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 11:34 am
|
|
Replies: 108
Views: 22328
|
I'm sure the fringe lists will be maintained here.
EDIT - I'd strongly recommend against a 'net:EA', by the way. The player base isn't big enough to stand fragmentation.
|
|
|
Forum: Wargaming Web News Topic: Fanatic Online #100 |
| Bombot |
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 11:13 am
|
|
Replies: 108
Views: 22328
|
| (CAL001 @ May 22 2008,11:03)QUOTEWell I think that it looks ok for our future, we have seen little to nothing really come from the last two years apart from fan based stuff. Being under the bigger umbrella with more support and the said new items for each system is a step forward. Cheers Aaron That... |
|
|
Forum: Wargaming Web News Topic: Fanatic Online #100 |
| Bombot |
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 10:55 am
|
|
Replies: 108
Views: 22328
|
(Evil and Chaos @ May 22 2008,10:51)
QUOTE I don't think that the Chaos presence on the web rules set will be gone for long.
Well I hope so.
Between Warmaster and Forgeworld and the Chaos boxset, there's a perfectly workable range of Chaos models. |
|
|
Forum: Wargaming Web News Topic: Fanatic Online #100 |
| Bombot |
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 10:44 am
|
|
Replies: 108
Views: 22328
|
What are you implying? ?I'm confused!
(EDIT - that was directed at E&C)
|
|
|
Forum: Wargaming Web News Topic: Fanatic Online #100 |
| Bombot |
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 10:36 am
|
|
Replies: 108
Views: 22328
|
| Oh yeah...hmmm, what's going to happen with Chaos then? I've still got a Chaos army waiting for me to glue it together! |
|
|
Forum: Wargaming Web News Topic: Fanatic Online #100 |
| Bombot |
|
Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 10:17 am
|
|
Replies: 108
Views: 22328
|
I'm replying to this thread instead of E&C's, as I feel his is unnecessarily downbeat (sorry E&C  ).
This is good news I feel. GW finally deciding that maybe the ugly stepchild has some intelligence that people like (hmm, stretching that analogy maybe!). |
|
|
Forum: Other Wargames Miniatures Topic: Do you plan conversions? |
| Bombot |
|
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 3:50 pm
|
|
Replies: 14
Views: 3861
|
| I've always done conversions with a general goal in mind. Occasionally I get to the actual goal |
|
|
Forum: Other Scale Wargames (15mm and larger, and other scales) Topic: 40K Terminator models |
| Bombot |
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 11:03 am
|
|
Replies: 20
Views: 5235
|
| (CyberShadow @ Jul. 25 2007,12:43)QUOTENow, I have to admit that in general, GW minis have got better. Terminators, however, represent the exception to me. I really like the realy old school minis (including the original Grey Knights!). These guys should not be dynamic, and there is something a lot... |
|
|
| Sort by: |