| Author |
Message |
Forum: Tactical Command Updates Topic: Sense of humour amoungst GW mods lives! |
| Charax |
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 3:43 pm
|
|
Replies: 33
Views: 4543
|
| Speaking of SG mods, any idea why PG isn't one anymore? |
|
 |
Forum: Tactical Command Updates Topic: Bureaucracy at it?s finest. |
| Charax |
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 9:42 pm
|
|
Replies: 45
Views: 7356
|
| *looks around* I see no mention of people wanting it to be like the epic board - I didn't particularly like the epic board layout, but I understand why it was the way it was - just like I don't particularly like the layout of the new SG forum, but I understand why it is that way. I do, however, expe... |
|
|
Forum: Tactical Command Updates Topic: Bureaucracy at it?s finest. |
| Charax |
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 7:31 pm
|
|
Replies: 45
Views: 7356
|
sorry, forgot who we were talking about for a moment there  |
|
|
Forum: Tactical Command Updates Topic: Bureaucracy at it?s finest. |
| Charax |
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 6:24 pm
|
|
Replies: 45
Views: 7356
|
| The [NEC] tag thing is another example of them (be they GW or the Mods) deciding to make up a rule and enforce it before they actually bother to TELL people. Do you see any mention of the rule in the Necro forum stickies? And the general forum specifically says they arent needed. Bloody crazy. You'd... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Tyranids Topic: BIO-NAVY: Quasi-repost: Tyranid Orbital Assets |
| Charax |
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 5:41 am
|
|
Replies: 15
Views: 4766
|
But without the BFG mini requirement, SG wouldnt be able to sell more models, and therefore milk money out of us 
Why do you actually need the BFG model anyway? it dosent actually DO anything.
How cool is it that we have a Jake Blues emoticon? I mean really  |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Tyranids Topic: BIO-NAVY: Quasi-repost: Tyranid Orbital Assets |
| Charax |
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 12:51 am
|
|
Replies: 15
Views: 4766
|
| Most formations will have leaders, so will take a maximum of 1BM per NS attack, and will then be able to regroup - I see no reason to limit them further |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Tyranids Topic: BIO-NAVY: Quasi-repost: Tyranid Orbital Assets |
| Charax |
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:44 pm
|
|
Replies: 15
Views: 4766
|
| Ah, a fellow old-time epicer! I liked the OBS rules too, and I picked up a copy of SM a while ago for the models (who needs these new-fangled models anyway?) To be perfectly honest, I see no problem with replacing starships with off-board support, after all, it IS off-board support, the same rules w... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Tyranids Topic: BIO-NAVY: Quasi-repost: Tyranid Orbital Assets |
| Charax |
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:54 pm
|
|
Replies: 15
Views: 4766
|
| I don't really want anything to be 1+ - you can only have one ship, and if that happens to be a droneship, then you're negating the choice that people pay extra for. Same with making the others 0-1. 0-2 maybe, that'd stop someone taking 2 mycetic reinforcements + Nightmare spores. Eww The major disa... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Tyranids Topic: BIO-NAVY: Quasi-repost: Tyranid Orbital Assets |
| Charax |
|
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:18 pm
|
|
Replies: 15
Views: 4766
|
| Oooh, the warm glow of feedback. 1) That's a possibility, but it's supposed to represent a small cluster of munitions that don't necessarily need to land in the same area. it's supposed to disrupt as many different formations as possible without using the large template. 2) Well, I'm a practising pl... |
|
|
Forum: Tactical Command Updates Topic: Suggestion for new members and old! |
| Charax |
|
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 8:01 pm
|
|
Replies: 16
Views: 3407
|
| What advantage is there in filling out my profile when people can just ask me if they want to know something? I mean it's not like most people will actually care about the info there. I might fill it out just 'cos I'm bored (and getting no replies on any of my ideas, on any board, AT ALL, which is u... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Tyranids Topic: OTHER: Tyranid Phase diagram... |
| Charax |
|
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 7:07 pm
|
|
Replies: 8
Views: 2154
|
| that's a point - any chance of getting a Broodlord character upgrade for genestealers? or just having one incorporated into one of the stands in the Genestealer formation) - leader, EAMW+1, gives the formation (or just its stand) Scout. Just an idea, but it could make genestealers really, really use... |
|
|
Forum: Tactical Command Updates Topic: Suggestion for new members and old! |
| Charax |
|
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 6:47 pm
|
|
Replies: 16
Views: 3407
|
| No thanks, I live in the UK, I've had quite enough of people trying to collect my data. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Tyranids Topic: BIO-NAVY: Quasi-repost: Tyranid Orbital Assets |
| Charax |
|
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 4:43 am
|
|
Replies: 15
Views: 4766
|
| Well, as Ragnarok and I didn't exactly have the best timing for posting this idea (a week or so before the move) I thought I'd post the condensed, cleaned-up version for your consideration. Tyranid Orbital Weaponry: Pyro-acid bombardment: Many tyranid ships carry large batteries of bio-artillery to ... |
|
|
Forum: General Discussion Topic: Happy 4th of July! |
| Charax |
|
Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 10:43 am
|
|
Replies: 20
Views: 1687
|
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: v2 :: Background Blurbs |
| Charax |
|
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 4:00 pm
|
|
Replies: 6
Views: 1976
|
| Well, Veteran Princeps are pretty much self-explanatory, I'll see if I can dig up anything on the knights. |
|
|
| Sort by: |