| Author |
Message |
Forum: Tournaments, Conventions and Meet-ups Topic: AdeptiCon 2020 Epic Armageddon Events |
| Paradox |
|
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 11:49 pm
|
|
Replies: 6
Views: 6251
|
| I am looking forward to Saturday and plan on attending all events. |
|
 |
Forum: Tournaments, Conventions and Meet-ups Topic: AdeptiCon 2020 Epic Armageddon Events |
| Paradox |
|
Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2019 8:40 pm
|
|
Replies: 6
Views: 6251
|
| looking forward to attending |
|
|
Forum: Tournaments, Conventions and Meet-ups Topic: AdeptiCon 2019 Mar 27 - Apr 01 |
| Paradox |
|
Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2019 3:00 pm
|
|
Replies: 2
Views: 2201
|
Looking forward to this event and meeting some fellow NetEA players.
Signed up for all three slots.
See you next week. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Tau Topic: Vior'la Tau - Developmental V1.9 |
| Paradox |
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2018 1:54 am
|
|
Replies: 490
Views: 167902
|
have you considered making the barrage weapon on the Supremacy Suit to have two modes of fire:
60cm BP3 or
x3 AP6+/AT6+ 60cm Guided Missile
the intent here is to keep the barrage template but limit the range and only allow indirect fire with the use of markerlights |
|
|
Forum: Tournaments, Conventions and Meet-ups Topic: Epic UK list amendments |
| Paradox |
|
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 4:58 pm
|
|
Replies: 76
Views: 12815
|
|
|
Forum: Tournaments, Conventions and Meet-ups Topic: Epic UK list amendments |
| Paradox |
|
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 4:58 pm
|
|
Replies: 76
Views: 12815
|
| Some of the issues that I have seen with dominant lists is an over specialization/spam (ie taking lots of the same or similar units). This focus has benefits and drawbacks but in a tournament setting should be moderated to a certain degree. One soft option to consider to reduce spamming and encourag... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Orks Topic: 2017 - Ork Review |
| Paradox |
|
Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 9:31 pm
|
|
Replies: 245
Views: 87890
|
| The way I see it, Ghazgukull ork list should represent the kitchen sink list of orks. Speed Freaks list accounts for Evil Suns & Cult of Speed Clans (this is where the mobile orks should be with cheap transports) Feral Orks list account for Snake Bite Clan Kommandos and Storm Boyz account for Bl... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Orks Topic: 2017 - Ork Review |
| Paradox |
|
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:10 pm
|
|
Replies: 245
Views: 87890
|
| Have you considered upgrading the Boyz FF to 5+? Effectively making them FF on par with IG infantry. This would go a long way to making the Warbands more effective in numerous ways and refocusing the Orks on assaulting hoards of infantry. I believe this keeps with the theme of Orks (assault focused)... |
|
|
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: If you could change the RULES of E:a... |
| Paradox |
|
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2017 6:04 pm
|
|
Replies: 62
Views: 16539
|
| - I don't like the way big WE don't suffer any suppression until BM = DC or any effects of damage - theres too big a difference between fearless and non fearless. Agree with the above. Suggested fix: - WE and WE formations with blast markers equal to half or more of there DC shoot at -1 - fearless ... |
|
|
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: Rules Question: Hit allocation in an Engagement with WE |
| Paradox |
|
Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:20 pm
|
|
Replies: 6
Views: 2402
|
Thank you.
Will that be clarified anywhere in the FAQ? |
|
|
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: Rules Question: Hit allocation in an Engagement with WE |
| Paradox |
|
Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2017 8:44 pm
|
|
Replies: 6
Views: 2402
|
| Question: How are/can hits be allocated in an engagement where 4 hits are scored on an engagement involving a Landing Craft (in CC) and a tactical marine squad (2 of the tactical marines are in CC)? A)Can all 4 hits be allocated by the marine player to the Landing craft since it is in CC, B)Can the ... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Squats Topic: Official Feedback and Battle Reports for 1.61 |
| Paradox |
|
Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2017 3:14 pm
|
|
Replies: 20
Views: 16664
|
| My feedback on the match with Taiaha: Squat +1 rally role really came into play in this game and felt right (pretty much rallied everything which feels right for stubborn squats). Too many failed activations on the squats part lead to an inability to test anything well. Thoughts on the list and the ... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: 2017 - Proposed Change to Ratio of Support Choices |
| Paradox |
|
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2017 3:21 pm
|
|
Replies: 64
Views: 22048
|
| Yup, that is where I was headed. With the ratios. Make BT the Aspect heavy list Make Ulthwe the Guardians heavy list This could addresses SOME of the concerns around list builds being felt from Australia but in my mind doesn't seem tackle the feelings emanating from there of frustration when facing ... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: 2017 - Proposed Change to Ratio of Support Choices |
| Paradox |
|
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2017 2:53 pm
|
|
Replies: 64
Views: 22048
|
| Just a thought. Perhaps you want to try the new Ratio with the Ulthwe list development. Specifically that Ulthwe are more focused on Guardians over Aspects and you could see what that would look like or what that might develop into. In the case of Ulthwe you could do something like Guardians open up... |
|
|
Forum: EA Battle Reports Topic: Cadian Shock Troopers (v1.5) vs Vior’la Tau (v1.8a) |
| Paradox |
|
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2017 1:52 pm
|
|
Replies: 14
Views: 4962
|
mordoten
[quoteYou wrote "Hold (move and rally)" a couple of times. You can either shed the BM, move or shoot ehen you hold. Don't know if you played it like that.][/quote]
My mistake. I believe those should have been described as Marshal Actions (move then regroup) in the write up. |
|
|
| Sort by: |