| Author |
Message |
Forum: NetEpic Topic: Is NetEpic Gold... deadish? |
| hydroblender |
|
Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2017 3:34 am
|
|
Replies: 6
Views: 5424
|
| Do you have a link to the facebook group you mention? Cant seem to find it |
|
 |
Forum: NetEpic Topic: Rule sets |
| hydroblender |
|
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2017 8:11 am
|
|
Replies: 12
Views: 7873
|
| I started with Adeptus Titanicus, moved to SM/TL (and loved it), and completely lost interest with it all when Epic 40k was released (i hated the 3rd edition). Way back when, i had a sizeable Eldar army that i of course sold when i lost interest. Some 20 something years later, a mate and I were look... |
|
|
Forum: NetEpic Topic: Warmonger Titan hit location template |
| hydroblender |
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 2:02 am
|
|
Replies: 11
Views: 4760
|
| Hi, For what its worth Ive attached a bunch of stuff i worked on a few years back, it may or may not be of use. |
|
|
Forum: NetEpic Gold Army Lists Topic: Gold Summary for Titan Legions |
| hydroblender |
|
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 10:07 am
|
|
Replies: 40
Views: 12528
|
|
|
Forum: NetEpic Alternative Rules Topic: Thoughts on Platinum |
| hydroblender |
|
Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2014 10:17 am
|
|
Replies: 44
Views: 15427
|
| Hi, my two cents, I don't have a problem with the current D6 system, it works 'ok' and other options seem to have wider implications on the game mechanics (reading the above comments). I've never had an issue with fliers or AA maybe I'm playing the game incorrectly but the current rules are nice, si... |
|
|
Forum: NetEpic Topic: The Great Revision Debate! |
| hydroblender |
|
Posted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:28 am
|
|
Replies: 54
Views: 16800
|
| Are you interested in expanding the background information within an army book, i.e. the squats. reading all the squat wikis there's a bit of expanded info that could go into the book which would for one explain why the squats don't trust the eldar and hate the orks so much. |
|
|
Forum: NetEpic Topic: Squat praetorians |
| hydroblender |
|
Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2013 6:37 am
|
|
Replies: 19
Views: 8196
|
| I know exactly what you mean, I have a set of SOP's (standard operating procedures) that have just been updated multiple times over the years, because i wrote the original i dont see the errors anymore, you have to get fresh eyes to read them to find the errors. whilst we've moved to a discussion on... |
|
|
Forum: NetEpic Topic: Squat praetorians |
| hydroblender |
|
Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 3:10 am
|
|
Replies: 19
Views: 8196
|
| Thats the way i read it, 10cm capped move but always fires first fire segment even if moved. |
|
|
Forum: NetEpic Topic: Squat praetorians |
| hydroblender |
|
Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 1:57 am
|
|
Replies: 19
Views: 8196
|
| You Sir are a scholar and a gentleman. |
|
|
Forum: NetEpic Topic: Squat praetorians |
| hydroblender |
|
Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 1:43 am
|
|
Replies: 19
Views: 8196
|
| Awesome Thanks Primach, is this the same for the Leviathan and the Behemoth? |
|
|
Forum: NetEpic Topic: Squat praetorians |
| hydroblender |
|
Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2013 1:23 am
|
|
Replies: 19
Views: 8196
|
| Hi, Just seeking clarification re Squat praetorian's and fire/movement. Page 28 of the army book shows that the Cyclops and Colossus Always Fire on First Fire yet i cant find this in the unit descriptions, is this a typo? correct but not mentioned elsewhere? and if it is correct does it also count f... |
|
|
Forum: NetEpic Topic: Doomweaver template |
| hydroblender |
|
Posted: Sat Jul 20, 2013 7:38 am
|
|
Replies: 1
Views: 1174
|
| Hi, just wondering how large the doom weaver template is? |
|
|
Forum: NetEpic Topic: NetEpic new ideas discussion |
| hydroblender |
|
Posted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 12:46 am
|
|
Replies: 51
Views: 12491
|
| Another vote for Corrections and explanations, i agree that there's nothing wrong with the core rules, a little worried about all the talk of army list rewrites to include new units IMHO 40k is unbalanced in favor of Marine type armies, one of the things i love about NetEpic is its balance. |
|
|
Forum: NetEpic Topic: Tunnelers that have surfaced |
| hydroblender |
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 2:14 am
|
|
Replies: 3
Views: 1447
|
| Thanks Primarch, so the movement rates given are for movement above ground if the tunneler chooses not to tunnel? |
|
|
Forum: NetEpic Topic: Tunnelers that have surfaced |
| hydroblender |
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 1:53 am
|
|
Replies: 3
Views: 1447
|
| Hi, once a tunneler has surfaced and dismounted it troops can it remount the troops go back under the ground and reappear anywhere a turn later or does it only move its allocated movement underground? How do you represent its location underground if it can re-tunnel? |
|
|
| Sort by: |