| Author |
Message |
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: Blood Angels List Development Thread |
| Nuka |
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 10:51 am
|
|
Replies: 423
Views: 152714
|
I realize that Grey knight and BA storm raven are two unique units. But shouldnt they have the same armor and the BA missiles seem vastly superior to me.
Armor:
GK 4+
BA 5+ reinforced
missiles:
GK 45cm AT 5+
BA 2x 60 AT +3 SS
BA missiles have superior range and I'd take 2*SS 3+ any day over 5+ |
|
 |
Forum: 6mm (and 8mm) Topic: Some Titan Weapons my buddy did ! |
| Nuka |
|
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:27 am
|
|
Replies: 8
Views: 4350
|
| Really cool stuff, did he make casts of them? |
|
|
Forum: 6mm (and 8mm) Topic: Info on stormravens |
| Nuka |
|
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:07 am
|
|
Replies: 9
Views: 3827
|
|
|
Forum: NetEA Orks Topic: ork fighta-bommer missing firing arcs? |
| Nuka |
|
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2015 1:43 pm
|
|
Replies: 15
Views: 8103
|
And that makes chaos fliers next to useless for intercepting orks intercepting.
-First the orks will get free shots at the approaching hellblades/doomwings
-when the renaming interceptors return fire, the orks will be able to jink |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Orks Topic: ork fighta-bommer missing firing arcs? |
| Nuka |
|
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2015 12:02 pm
|
|
Replies: 15
Views: 8103
|
| but in regards to jinks: is it correct that you can make you free flak attack against approaching enemy aircraft(or indeed a ground attack) and still be able to jink, but the approaching interceptor on the other hand would not be able to jink without loosing it's attack. In my mind, and aircraft app... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Orks Topic: ork fighta-bommer missing firing arcs? |
| Nuka |
|
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2015 10:58 am
|
|
Replies: 15
Views: 8103
|
| Kinda make them superior in air to air superiority fight to other factions. fighter-bommas can approach thunderbolts from the rear and fire away without the thunderbolts being able to make a flak attack when the bommers approach. However, should the thunderbolts approach the bommers they always get ... |
|
|
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: lost and the damned undivided vs not |
| Nuka |
|
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2015 10:42 am
|
|
Replies: 7
Views: 4110
|
| "A formation that has no units from a hated formation within 15cm of any of its units receives a +1 modifier to its initiative test. If even if one hated unit is within 15cm then this bonus is lost. This modifier only ever applies to units that are on the battlefield; aircraft and any other for... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Orks Topic: ork fighta-bommer missing firing arcs? |
| Nuka |
|
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2015 10:23 am
|
|
Replies: 15
Views: 8103
|
| most flyer weapons have restricted firing arcs(mostly ff) but both the fighta-bommers weapons are unrestricted in their firing arc. Is this intentional? |
|
|
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: LATD: Blood thirster |
| Nuka |
|
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2015 10:05 am
|
|
Replies: 1
Views: 2097
|
| Blood Thirster have two weapons listed: Axe of Khorne (base contact) (Assault Weapons), TK(1), EA(+2) Bloodthirster Whip (base contact) (Assault Weapons), TK(+1), EA(+1) one have TK(1), the other have TK(+1), is there any difference between the two (apart from the number of EA). Could it not just be... |
|
|
Forum: NetEpic Alternative Rules Topic: Net Epic Evolution Basic Rules & Video Tutorial |
| Nuka |
|
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2015 10:39 am
|
|
Replies: 167
Views: 113281
|
| Playing mostly ea now, the one thing i miss from epic is the orders phase. I really like that part, giving out orders primarily based on what you think will happen, and not based on what has just happened. But at the same time, units should be allowed to react to what the enemy does. My suggestion w... |
|
|
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: Sponsons for landraider variants |
| Nuka |
|
Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2015 9:47 am
|
|
Replies: 0
Views: 1001
|
I need to make a few Land Raider Redeemer variants. Anyone have good suggestions for sponsons i might use?
(its for plastic mk II landraider) |
|
|
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: Epic Proxy List Mk II |
| Nuka |
|
Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2015 11:41 am
|
|
Replies: 299
Views: 356447
|
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: Skitarii v2.00 |
| Nuka |
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 6:11 pm
|
|
Replies: 117
Views: 26105
|
Vaaish wrote: I was looking over the rules again and I didn't see the clarification that the Carapace Landing Pad affected all model in a unit (i.e. two minorus with inferno cannons and one with a CLP would allow indirect fire on the inferno cannons)
or ordinatus mars taking ordinatus minoris with a clp >:D |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: Where to go with the Skitarii in 2011 |
| Nuka |
|
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:05 pm
|
|
Replies: 100
Views: 19829
|
| well, yes you could put it that way as well, the upgrade does seem cheap compared to other comparable infantry |
|
|
Forum: Casting, Sculpting and Creating Miniatures Topic: Charybdis ordinatus |
| Nuka |
|
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 2:15 pm
|
|
Replies: 258
Views: 81036
|
| Is that thing for sale, i'd love to have one of those |
|
|
| Sort by: |