Tactical Command

Search found 5 matches
	Search these results:

Author

Message

Forum: NetEpic Topic: Gargants

robroy hawkman

Post subject: Re: Gargants

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:49 am

Replies: 11
Views: 4800

And what about Imperator titans, which have 2 legs, but their bottom zone are not legs but bastion ?

Forum: NetEpic Topic: Deep Strike Vs Tunneler Rule Problem

robroy hawkman

Post subject: Re: Deep Strike Vs Tunneler Rule Problem

Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2011 9:49 pm

Replies: 11
Views: 4103

But these units are only in 2 codex, Imperial guard & Squats, and the text are differents between them. IG tunnelers don't deep strike.

Forum: NetEpic Topic: Deep Strike Vs Tunneler Rule Problem

robroy hawkman

Post subject: Re: Deep Strike Vs Tunneler Rule Problem

Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2011 9:15 am

Replies: 11
Views: 4103

Don't you find strange a typo which appears in all the tunnelers description, and only for Squats ? Who is the codex squats author ? Maybe we could ask him?

Forum: NetEpic Topic: Deep Strike Vs Tunneler Rule Problem

robroy hawkman

Post subject: Re: Deep Strike Vs Tunneler Rule Problem

Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 3:03 pm

Replies: 11
Views: 4103

I don't understand... In the codex Squats V5, squats tunnelers could use deep strike. In the codex gold, they can use it too. In the tactica V5, there is the sentence "The Squat tunnellers are more accurate than the imperial equivalent and thus will surface close to the intended point." (p...

Forum: NetEpic Topic: Deep Strike Vs Tunneler Rule Problem

robroy hawkman

Post subject: Re: Deep Strike Vs Tunneler Rule Problem

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 4:02 pm

Replies: 11
Views: 4103

Moreover in the Squats & IG codex, each tunneler unit (exception for the RAM in squat codex) has in its description the sentence: "They are Tunnelers and may initially appear anywhere on the board as per the Deep Strike rules. Only for the squats, not the Imperial Guard, except for Hellbore.

Sort by:

Page 1 of 1 [ Search found 5 matches ]

Jump to: