| Author |
Message |
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: Blood Angels v2.11 |
| vytzka |
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 10:49 am
|
|
Replies: 38
Views: 8008
|
| Yes, I know, that's what I've been using as regular thunderhawks :p Oh well. Oh my God why are Attack Bikes mandatory now? I don't even have any attack bikes, I have been using the ancient plastic bike models. Was the regular bike formation too good? (Yes. Yes it was. But I'd rather have had a price... |
|
 |
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: Blood Angels v2.11 |
| vytzka |
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 10:38 am
|
|
Replies: 38
Views: 8008
|
| Oh wow. I see some substantial changes. No titans is certainly... something. Can't even give any feedback right now because I can't remember half of the rules. But a friend expressed an interest in Epic: A so I'll be taking this for a whirl on Saturday and see what happens. How are you supposed to m... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: NetEA Marine upgrades |
| vytzka |
|
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 9:19 am
|
|
Replies: 122
Views: 17826
|
| Quote: (BlackLegion @ Feb. 03 2010, 22:34 ) Quote: (Chroma @ Jan. 28 2010, 17:17 ) Quote: (BlackLegion @ Jan. 28 2010, 16:11 ) Ot *shock* 3+ Reinforced Armour!  The thing is... that's probably a stat reflective of their actual toughness...  Anyone seriously support this?  ... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: [Units] Attack Bikes |
| vytzka |
|
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 10:35 am
|
|
Replies: 103
Views: 11179
|
| Well I've never used attack bikes and never missed them (in case someone needs more datapoints). Granted, I don't have a single model but I have never stopped and said "I wish I had some attack bikes for this very situation". It's kind of funny, because while multimelta attack bikes are all en vogue... |
|
|
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: Warhound with no weapons |
| vytzka |
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 12:13 pm
|
|
Replies: 11
Views: 1600
|
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: NetEA Marine upgrades |
| vytzka |
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 11:38 am
|
|
Replies: 122
Views: 17826
|
Come to think of it, I like having the only one option in the list not being a multiple of 25 as a design decision. And I like making Land Raiders deservedly more awesome.
I guess I'm on board with this after all. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: NetEA Marine upgrades |
| vytzka |
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:27 pm
|
|
Replies: 122
Views: 17826
|
While as I said I'm not going to die from this, it is rather odd to ask people for their opinion and then don't pay attention to it.
I'm not saying that you don't have good reasons, Hena, but we're probably entitled to hearing them. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: Suggested Codex Marines detachment addition |
| vytzka |
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 1:19 pm
|
|
Replies: 18
Views: 4296
|
| Quote: (GR00V3R @ Jan. 26 2010, 13:54 ) Quote: (vytzka @ Jan. 26 2010, 09:44 ) done the math and found them better point for point for that than terminators Terminators should cost more. They can teleport.  True. But people do use terminators for air assaults. And they kick butt for th... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: Suggested Codex Marines detachment addition |
| vytzka |
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:53 am
|
|
Replies: 18
Views: 4296
|
| Quote: (Evil and Chaos @ Jan. 26 2010, 11:48 ) Quote: (vytzka @ Jan. 26 2010, 09:44 ) Weren't 4 PF/AC dreadnoughts found to be a bit much in a thunderhawk assault? This has definitely been discussed in the past. That's why the formation should be 2 of each type, rather than 4 power fist Dr... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: Suggested Codex Marines detachment addition |
| vytzka |
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:44 am
|
|
Replies: 18
Views: 4296
|
| Weren't 4 PF/AC dreadnoughts found to be a bit much in a thunderhawk assault? This has definitely been discussed in the past. IIRC yours truly has done the math and found them better point for point for that than terminators, for what it's worth. Admittedly that's theory... we need a cool name for t... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: NetEA Marine upgrades |
| vytzka |
|
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:10 am
|
|
Replies: 122
Views: 17826
|
Vindicators have been 50pts apiece in Blood Angels list for quite a while now (albeit not having their own formation) and I don't think anyone found them too good or anything. Though maybe people are just accustomed to ignoring them by now 
|
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: NetEA Marine upgrades |
| vytzka |
|
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:11 pm
|
|
Replies: 122
Views: 17826
|
Well I promise to assemble and paint my Landing Craft if Vindicators go down to 50 each  (as I already have 4 of them painted)
|
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: NetEA Marine upgrades |
| vytzka |
|
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:27 am
|
|
Replies: 122
Views: 17826
|
| Quote: (frogbear @ Jan. 19 2010, 12:22 ) Quote: (Hena @ Jan. 19 2010, 18:51 ) Just to point out. I'd like to hear reasons why you want something not just listing that 50 points for Vindicator Would it not be more prudent to ask why a minority would not want the changes the majority are ask... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: [Units] Close Combat Exarchs |
| vytzka |
|
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:00 pm
|
|
Replies: 30
Views: 4742
|
Are banshees currently 2+ CC? If so, could that be considered a stealth boost to them? 
But I agree with the rest, no real need to introduce this at this stage. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Astartes Topic: NetEA Marine upgrades |
| vytzka |
|
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 2:33 pm
|
|
Replies: 122
Views: 17826
|
| If I wasn't entirely clear, I'm okay with Walker or no Walker as long as vindicators go down to 50 apiece. |
|
|
| Sort by: |