Author |
Message |
Forum: General Discussion Topic: eBay link for new site |
Muad'Dib |
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 8:46 pm
|
|
Replies: 7 Views: 38019
|
Thanks Dave, sorted.
Old fart question: what's a wiki? I take it this isn't a cricket term... |
|
 |
Forum: General Discussion Topic: eBay link for new site |
Muad'Dib |
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:04 pm
|
|
Replies: 7 Views: 38019
|
Hello again everyone, 1st time on the new look forums. Looking very nice. A search didn't answer this question, so here it is: My link to eBay was set up to deposit a tiny bit of cash to this website whenever I won an auction. The link isn't working - "The link you clicked on has expired... |
|
 |
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: Generic Imperial detachments |
Muad'Dib |
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:32 pm
|
|
Replies: 13 Views: 2126
|
Adeptus Arbites Frateris Militia Redemptionist Nutcases |
|
 |
Forum: General Discussion Topic: Epic A Article |
Muad'Dib |
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 11:41 am
|
|
Replies: 17 Views: 3522
|
Good article chaps. ?At the risk of nit-picking, the first version of the game was "Adeptus Titanicus", not "Titan Legions". The AT boxed set covered titans alone; the "Space Marine" boxed set added infantry, although the two games were self-contained so you could play games with either version alon... |
|
 |
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: Wh40k weapons to Epic |
Muad'Dib |
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 5:16 pm
|
|
Replies: 51 Views: 7100
|
The gauss infantry auto-wound is pretty pointless. ?It only affects T8+ targets. ?That's C'Tan (er..why would necrons shoot at their own gods?), wraithlords (which are vehicles in epic), and gargantuan creatures (which are WE in epic). So in E:A terms, it's already covered if you give them AT6+ Pers... |
|
 |
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: NEWS NEWS NEWS" |
Muad'Dib |
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 1:45 pm
|
|
Replies: 57 Views: 7432
|
I can see Cal001's point, but I'm not really comfortable with being GW's Ministry of Truth (Epic DoublePlusGood!!!) for all the potential new players out there when GW can't be arsed acknowledging the game exists. And I suspect many or most of us are a bit long in the tooth to get too enthused about... |
|
 |
Forum: Wargames Trades Topic: Looking for sculpting help! |
Muad'Dib |
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 12:04 pm
|
|
Replies: 3 Views: 1349
|
The only way I can think of to represent a swarm of flies is to use wisps of black cotton wool or similar material. ?Have these so that they appear to be streaming out of the vents in her backpack, rents and joints of her armour, eyes and mouth....urgh....might be tricky to pull off, but would look ... |
|
 |
Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments Topic: Intermingled Formations |
Muad'Dib |
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 11:50 am
|
|
Replies: 27 Views: 5392
|
(Ginger @ Jan. 04 2008,17:31)QUOTEI am also with Neal here. IMO This is one of those occasions where playability or 'the game' takes precedence over "reality" or 'the simulation'. Think of it a bit like a knights 'fork' or even a 'fools mate' in chess - something that you learn very early on and th... |
|
 |
Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments Topic: Intermingled Formations |
Muad'Dib |
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 6:55 pm
|
|
Replies: 27 Views: 5392
|
@nealhunt: Quite right. Slip of the keyboard *ahem* @Moscovian: IRL generals wouldn't deliberately space units apart so as to minimise one panicking when it saw its buddies run away. They might do it to mimise damage from enemy artillery, increase coverage etc. As you say, smaller units ... |
|
 |
Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments Topic: Intermingled Formations |
Muad'Dib |
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 2:07 pm
|
|
Replies: 27 Views: 5392
|
Thanks for the responses all, I guess that settles that. Seems a bit odd that distant units will deliberately stay away from a large one to avoid being "rolled" with them if they break, I thought the "add a BM if within 15cm of a loser" rule accounted for that. I'll continue with the "house ru... |
|
 |
Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments Topic: Epic Armageddon HANDBOOK 2008 |
Muad'Dib |
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:31 pm
|
|
Replies: 15 Views: 9991
|
Hi there, excellent work to all concerned!
I've got an issue with the intermingling rule as I think it should be clarified in the handbook. ?Added a thread here: |
|
 |
Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments Topic: Intermingled Formations |
Muad'Dib |
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:27 pm
|
|
Replies: 27 Views: 5392
|
Hello all. Reading through the new E:A handbook 2008 (excellent work Markonz et al!) I noticed that the Intermingled Formations rule 1.12.10 has not been cleared up. "Seems clear to me" you may say, but read on... I think the original rule in the published rulebook suffered from "developer blinkers"... |
|
 |
Forum: Wargames Trades Topic: EBay Usernames |
Muad'Dib |
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:07 am
|
|
Replies: 141 Views: 175102
|
(TheLimey @ Dec. 19 2007,19:51)
QUOTE How come it always happens to me then.... ?  Cos your bidding waaay too much!  |
|
 |
Forum: Wargames Trades Topic: EBay Usernames |
Muad'Dib |
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 8:39 pm
|
|
Replies: 141 Views: 175102
|
(TheLimey @ Sep. 14 2007,18:18)QUOTEOf course, this is now useless. Ebay has now set up a randomiser, so you can only see the real names of user names of bidders if you are the one selling the item. Nope. The randomiser only applies when the auction is over a certain value (?100 on eBay.co.uk... |
|
 |
Forum: Wargames Trades Topic: So CS hows the ebay link working out? |
Muad'Dib |
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:46 pm
|
|
Replies: 4 Views: 920
|
Do you get paid when we hit the link, or when we bid, or only when we pay for something, or what?
I set it as a link in my favourites, but only after I'd done most of my "shopping" in the early months...but I still go on daily. |
|
 |
Sort by: |